In the article, Do Female CEO's Mean
Family-Friendly Workplaces, Anna North starts a debate over whether having
women in larger leadership roles makes a better workplace for other women below
them. When looked into further not much information came up helping the issue
that more female executives might help lower the wage gap, and create a more
family friendly workplace. The article actually points out that a study found
that when there were in fact women in higher positions they were not more
likely to pay their male and female employees equally. If there are women who
hold the power to change the status quo, but still can not manage to treat the
women and men of their companies equally then what message does that send to
women working below them? Not a very encouraging one in my opinion. This
reminded me of the article we read in class, Why Women Still Cant have it
All, by Anne-Marie Slaughter. There was a part in the article where she was
talking about how she had her dream job but still felt as though she needed to
be home with her 14 year old son. When she went on to talk to a female
colleague, who held a senior position in the white house, she told her about
her difficulties juggling her roles and to me the interaction they had was not
an effective one. Ultimately this woman left her job and "hurried home as fast as she
could". There are not many women holding high leadership roles in
companies, but if the few that are would step up and make the attempt to
positively encourage the women under them then it would be beneficial for women
everywhere.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/annanorth/do-female-ceos-mean-family-friendly-workplaces
No comments:
Post a Comment