Deciding on a topic for this week’s post was incredibly
difficult for me. I feel like I am so
far removed from this issue that I didn’t have just one concept that stuck out
to me—the entire discussion, as a whole, was eye-opening. We are at a time in western culture where gay
people are allowed to get married in some states, but the rights of a woman
over her own body are becoming more limited in some states. Our social structure in the United States puts
women into the role of mother and tells women how to be mothers. Men are at the top of the social structure in
that they have the most political control over the situation as governing
bodies are still majority male; they can decide whether or not each state will
have abortion as a legal option. This
power sitting in the hands of men seems to be—to me—a way of enforcing one’s
views onto other people in a way that has a rippling effect that spouts into
political protests outside of abortion clinics.
The constitution gives Americans the right to choose their religion and
a freedom of speech, but in many places, women cannot make the decision as to
whether or not they give birth to a child.
To me, this becomes a way of
forcing one’s belief system onto other people.
This issue
of reproductive rights and abortion are so controversial that many of the
clinics that women go to for the procedure are in awful conditions. In our reading “My Abortion,” which gave an
account of twenty-six women and their experience with abortion, the women
talked a little bit about the conditions they were in. Specifically, one woman in the article said, “the doctor was grotesque. He whistled show
tunes. I could hear the vacuum sucking out the fetus alongside his
whistling”(Heather). The media often
represents abortion through a biased anti abortion lens—presumably because
these large companies are run by religious men—and makes it seem like the women
who go through with the procedure are terrible people. I found a rather long video on YouTube
that is heavily biased against
abortion. It is fifteen minutes long,
but I encourage you to mute it and just skim through and watch it with your own
lens uninfluenced by the opinions of the hosts (no need to watch the whole
thing, just randomly scrolling through the video gives you perspective on the
interior of an abortion clinic) and then shuffle through it randomly again,
this time unmuted. An uneducated person
seeing this video might be easily coerced into an anti-abortion stance through
the depiction of their perspective. While
one stance on this debate is not more valuable than the other, how each side is
depicted through the media largely impacts how individuals form their own
opinions.
This first thing that caught my attention during the video was that they referred to the clinic as an "abortion mill" which just made me roll my eyes. While their bias is clear, it is interesting to see how they frame the situation in order to push their agenda. They walk through the closed clinic and criticize the fact that it is dirty and unkept, even though they acknowledge at the beginning of the video that the clinic has been closed for a while therefore no one has been there to check in on its state or clean anything. During their criticism of the building (and the people who worked there) they do no once acknowledge the fact that there is an absolute lack of funding for clinics such as these, leading the buildings to sometimes fall into disrepair. It also did not escape me that these are two men, one of whom is the president of a pro-life organization, discussing things that are purely women's issues. Regardless of your opinion on the subject of abortion, it seems clear that this is video was produced out of ignorance to the whole situation.
ReplyDelete